Vatican II and
the Corrupt Papacy of Francis: Extinguishing the Light of 2000 Years
What does it
do so few dare utter the obvious
— the indisputable realization
that Francis is recreant: an apostate; that his foremost agenda
is nothing less than destroying the Catholic Church as it had been
known and recognized for 2000 years prior to not just to his own
papacy, but to Vatican II — of which he is preeminently the pathological
product — and the most vociferous advocate?
Few — critics and supporters alike — understand his agendum as
he says and does, people insist that he is doing something other,
something less — even when he himself states that:
“The Second Vatican Council, the 1962-65 meetings that
brought the church into the modern world, had promised
such an opening to people of other faiths and
non-believers, but ... the church hadn’t
made progress since then” and that in light of his
predecessors’ failure to deliver on the factitious Ecumenism
promised... “I have the humility and ambition
to do so”. 1
That this is an oxymoron apparently escapes Francis — never
a student or adherent of logic — more than emphasizes Francis’s
limitation to prosaic rhetoric. The tone — to say nothing of
the intention — is absolutely clear: rapprochement with
“the world” and pantheistic ecumenism that extends no less to
the heretic Luther than to American aboriginal tribes: all worship
the same god: Gitche Manitou no less than Allah — for
each is a merely a cultural iteration of the one same divinity
that all equally serve and worship ... even while
Gitche Manitou deems Catholicism demonic and Allah continues
to reap with the sword, holding Catholics to be idolaters. Quite
a unilateral ecumenical feat … Francis smiles, offers a few
grains of incense and a Pantheon of gods is established despite
the incessant internecine war — to say nothing of the logical
Beyond Plausible Deniability
Who can deny it?
Indeed, how many approve of it — especially in the episcopacy
— and encourage it, both inside Holy Mother Church and,
of course, outside Her. They clamor for the world, its perversity,
its immorality, its freedom from any inhibitions, prohibitions,
and all restrictions — that is to say, anything normative and
proscriptive. In other words, they aspire to perfect freedom
and latitude in all things — an aspiration that
eo ipso precludes God. It is a matter far beyond recourse
to any credible notion of plausible deniability, for the clarity
of disaffection is striking, manifest, and unmistakable.
The Grayscale, and Moral Saturation
It is a world where
nothing is intrinsically and indefeasibly good and nothing intrinsically
and indefeasibly evil. It is, as Francis describes the moral
terrain, fundamentally grayscale: it does not attain to either black
or white but merely fluctuates in saturation without moral absolutes.
It is essentially a sliding gamma scale whose slider can move in
one direction only: to ever diminishing saturation that eventually
culminates in the absence of distinction and discernability altogether
— at which point we can make no pronouncement because there is nothing
to pronounce. It is the impetus to moral relativity, and eventually
to moral collapse. Nihil bonum et nihil malum est.2
Logically, of course, this precludes any coherent conception of
God — a Being Who has decided demands, determinate laws, an invincible
propensity for ONLY what is good and an absolute and unequivocal
demand for it. The two … let us say “propensities” … therefore,
are incompatible and irreconcilable. It is called the Law of Non-Contradiction
in Logic. One cannot have something and at one and the same time
the negation of it. One cannot have God and turpitude, good that
is concurrently evil. Of course the two exist — but as contrarieties,
not as moral and metaphysical equivalents.
Instead of providing
a breastwork against this doctrine that is alien to Catholicism,
Francis urges it further, and the further it is prompted the more
inconsistent it becomes, the less recognizable as something distinct
from a thousand other “iterations” of “Christianity” equally claiming
plausibility upon the most tenuous and most often absurd credentials.
The corrupt papacy of Francis, coupled with — and as a result
of — the horrific consequences of Vatican II has made the
new “Church of Accompaniment in Sin and a God of Surprises”
a simulacrum and nothing more: a poorly contrived counterfeit at
Expunging 2000 Years … in 5
“Make a Mess”, Francis
“devilishly” proclaimed. He has succeeded beyond any pathological
fiction he could have possibly conjured:
In a short five
years he has either contorted, disfigured or dismantled the
Catholic Church purchased with the Blood of Christ and sealed with
the blood of the Martyrs. He has brought the Catholic Church of
over 2000 years to unimaginable turpitude and inconceivable scandal.
It is barely recognizable as Catholic in any sense that
corresponds to an ecclesiastical identity manifest in the two millenia
before the breach that occurred with the Second Vatican Council.
No longer steeped in holiness (and with a pronounced and growing
aversion to it) — but in perversion and perversity of
the most execrable kind, it is the consummation of homosexual
inbreeding among cardinals, bishops, priests, and very likely
even a pope. Homosexual predators ordained homosexual priests
and barred men who were not homosexual. These predator priests
became homosexual predator bishops, who in turn nominated other
bishops, who then became homosexual criminal cardinals. Every “boy”
took care of and covered, his “boy” until the possession was nearly
complete. It took nearly 60 years of unremitting and totally dedicated
work by the Pink Collar Club — but it brought the Church to Her
knees and perhaps the brink of schism.
the most Demonic Kind
Nothing short of a
total exorcism of this filth from the seminaries, parishes, chanceries,
and monasteries will suffice. Collars must be torn off. Bishops
and Cardinals must be laicized and evicted in laymen’s clothing
to the curbs of their luxurious offices and remanded to state authorities
for investigation. “The Church of Accompaniment” is in too
much complicity to entrust it with this absolutely necessary fumigation.
Face it and own up to it, whether you are a cardinal, bishop,
priest, friar, monk, sister, nun — and especially a lay person.
You trusted to a fault and despite your own deep and justifiable
misgivings that would not go away … looked the other way instead.
The fault is yours. And it is mine. We did not have the courage
to question and demand answers when our children, our young men,
fell victim to this widespread and indescribably horrible predation
in the holiest of places. We wanted to believe otherwise. And so
We got Francis because we deserve Francis — an uncouth,
vulgar, vindictive, and mentally incompetent man who was “nominated”
through a conspiratorial tour de force into the seat of Peter
by men (members of the notorious St. Gallen Group, a.k.a. the self-proclaimed
Mafia” ) unworthy of their collars and birettas, men who conspired
to make a simpleton a king — and when the simpleton turned vicious
and unpredictable, they too became too fearful to contradict him.
They had too much to lose.
And so do we. Even the little we have left will be taken away.
Please God that we can recover a remnant, a mere thread of the beautiful
holiness that was the Church before the Second Vatican Council —
and the papacy of Francis — the man who may have already overthrown
the Catholic Church of 2000 years in a mere five.
Despite him and despite us, Holy Mother Church will endure and prevail.
It may take years … perhaps centuries. But Christ Himself promised
us no less.
“Caelum et terra transibunt, verba autem Mea
non praeteribunt.” (St. Matthew 24.35)
2 Nothing is good and nothing is bad.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Boston Catholic Journal
Comments? Write us: