Francis Abolished Hell?
... and has
thy hand scandalize thee, cut it off: it is better for thee
to enter into life, maimed, than having two hands to go
into Hell, into unquenchable fire:
Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not extinguished.”
(Saint Mark 9.42-43)
“Receive the forgiveness of God
and go among the line of souls who contemplate Him,
the souls of those who are unrepentant,
and thus cannot be forgiven, simply disappear.”
does not exist, the disappearance of sinful souls exists.”
me, you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the
devil and his angels.”
(Saint Matthew 25:41)
“If thy right hand scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from
thee: for it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should
perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.”
(Saint Matthew 5:30)
that such antiquated concepts as Hell and punishment — even eternal
and unimaginable suffering — cannot possibly be true!
In fact he recently assured us that “No
one can be condemned forever, because that is not the logic
of the Gospel. Here I am not speaking only of
the divorced and remarried, but of everyone, in whatever
situation they find themselves”
then, uttered this nonsense?” you demand.
of course, is Saint Mark. What is more, we reply, we have never heard
of the Bible as a logical formulary, or Sacred Scripture understood
as a treatise on logic!
Is there a “Logic of the Gospel”?
a “logic of the Gospel”, we ask? One that supersedes,
and so validates or invalidates statements in (the
words of) the Gospel? In order to really arrive at
what is written in the Gospel and uttered by Christ, must I invoke
simple Modus Ponens, or De Morgan’s theorem in determining
their logical consistency and their place in a Truth Table?
difficulty — apart, of course, from the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted
to Holy Mother Church by God Himself — with the following contention:
it is now apparently incumbent upon me to explain to my acquaintances
that in Saint John 8.58, in using the temporal term before
Jesus is not expressing antecedence — inasmuch as it would be an anachronism
in light of the concept of eternity which preceded time —
— and therefore His subsequent use of the temporal and existential
concept of “am” while not a breach of the concept of eternity
is nevertheless a breach in the concept of time. Therefore (∴)
Christ, in this and most instances, could not possibly have meant
what He seems to have very clearly, simply,
and unambiguously stated concerning the
“invisible" and the eternal”?
A Propositional Exegesis of Holy Scripture?
In other words, I must propose the teachings of
Holy Scripture not in terms of faith — but logic — or more to
the point, in terms of logical consistency; and while
Francis’s appeal to logic is absurd,
the inevitable conclusion of what amounts to what may be called a
propositional exegesis of Sacred Scripture itself is not absurd
in the least!
must both vigorously and respectfully disagree with Francis, Bishop
of Rome, that the Four Gospels are logical treatises bound
to laws inherent in propositional logic rather than the Laws of God
enunciated by His Son and the Prophets in Sacred Scripture.
one of the vexing issues that, in broad circles, “do not accord
with the logic of the Gospel” is
in today’s reading: Jesus became angry! It does not
“fit” the progressive (and fictitious) notion that Jesus — and His Father,
for that matter — never become angry! In fact, they are never offended!
They are totally understanding and accepting of our idiocy, even our
blasphemy! After all, you have seen the real Jesus in
velvet art, pop culture, and in the rudifacient “children’s homilies”
at Mass by Deacon Dick:
come. See Jesus hug the Pharisees. See Jesus affirming the
Sadducees. See Jesus smile. See Jesus apologize for inconveniencing
and upsetting the Roman soldiers. Oh … that Cross-thing?
He is unhappy because we have not hugged each other enough
to break it you and to offend your feminized sensitivities — and proclivities
— but Jesus was a man. Not Mr. Rogers, not Mrs. Doubtfire, and
definitely not a wimp. He was beaten, scourged, mocked, crowned with
thorns, and crucified — that is not the stuff of wimps. Or delicate
yes — He occasionally became angry!
recorded in and testified to in all four Gospels-that-are-not-textbooks-on-logic.
because you have arrived at a satisfactory truth-variable through
logic — but because God said so — in Holy Scripture. And because
it is what the Holy Catholic Church authentically teaches and
has taught for 2000 years. Because it makes sense! And because Christ
is True God and True Man!
The Bible is not a Truth Table. It is the Living Word of
God. It is Truth, just as Christ is Truth Himself
(Saint John 14.6) — and most annoying to some, a truth at which you
will never arrive through propositional logic.
of the Gospel
of the Gospel”:
shalt not commit adultery”
— Jesus Christ
“We have renounced disgraceful, underhanded
ways; we refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God’s word.”
(2 Corinthians 4.2)
to you that call evil good, and good evil:
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness: that put bitter for sweet, and sweet
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable PDF Version
Comments? Write us:
Further Reading on the
Papacy of Francis:
Totally Faithful to the Sacred
Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome
opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum
Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
know your works ... that you have but little power, and
yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.”
Copyright © 2004 - 2022 Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission
is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying
and distribution of the articles and audio files under the
following conditions: No additions, deletions, or
changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any
way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the
reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text,
or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic