|
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL:

Exonerating God
Part II
The Problem Summarized
... and why we must respond to it
Before
we begin our attempt to arrive at an answer to the problem of evil,
we must first clearly summarize and completely understand the nature
of the problem itself.
While this may appear obvious, all too often our efforts to make
sense of the experience of evil in our lives and in the world fail
to adequately address implicit or unstated premises apart from which
no answer is either forthcoming or possible. Failing to follow the
premises, we fail to reach a conclusion. Instead, we reflexively
seize what is incontrovertible (the occurrences of evil) and,
understanding nothing of its antecedents, satisfy ourselves that it
is entirely a mystery --- in other words, utterly incomprehensible
to us --- in fact, so opaque to our ability to reason it through
(which we do not) that we throw up our hands in either frustration
or despair , declaring that either it is the will of God in a way we
do not understand, or that there can be no God in light of the
enormities that we experience. In either case --- whether we affirm
that God exists despite them, or deny that He exists because of them
--- we confront the experience of evil as an impenetrable mystery.
Such a facile answer, I suggest, is not a satisfactory state of
affairs at all.
While it remains true that we can only speculate upon the origin of
evil (in the Creation Narrative, the parallel existence of the
serpent with man (and I say parallel, because it is a supernatural
existence parallel to and concomitant with, created nature much in
the way that the supernatural being of Angels coexists with the
natural being of men) --- we are not, for that reason, absolved from
explaining not only how evil came to obtrude upon the affairs of
men, but why it is not incompatible with our conception of God as
all good and all powerful. Philosophy calls this endeavor a
theodicy. We needn’t be intimidated by this, nor think ourselves
unequal to it, as we shall see.
To further compound the issue, the problem is no mere academic
matter from which we can stand aloof as so many theorists to
hypothetical abstractions. It is a problem that vexes us, lacerates
us, at every turn, believer and unbeliever alike. It has a direct
and painful bearing upon us; it affects us, afflicts us, and, yes,
sometimes crushes us. Despite the refuge that the believer has taken
in the notion of mystery, or the cynicism to which the unbeliever
consigns himself in hopeless resignation, each cry out, equally and
withal, “Why …?” --- especially when the evil experienced or
perpetrated is an effrontery to justice, or a violation of
innocence.
The skeptic, most often a casualty of evil, cannot reconcile the
occurrence of evil with the existence of God. The two appear
incompatible. What is more, the empirical evidence of evil is far
more preponderant and far more compelling than any evidence that can
be adduced to the existence of God. The believer, on the other hand,
is painfully perplexed, and sometimes deeply scandalized, by this
seeming incompatibility which often buffets the faith which alone
sustains his belief, the faith that, somehow, the occurrence of evil
and the existence of God are not, in the end, irreconcilable.
First and foremost, it is critical to be clear about the context in
which the problem first occurred, and from which all subsequent
instances follow. Even before this, however, and as we have said, we
must be absolutely clear about the problem itself which, in summary, follows:
The Problem Summarized:
-
We understand by God
an absolutely omniscient Being Who is absolutely good and
absolutely powerful.
-
A being deficient in
any of these respects --- that is to say, wanting in either
knowledge, goodness or power --- we do not understand as God,
but as less than God.
-
An absolutely good,
absolutely powerful, and absolutely omniscient Being would know
every instance of evil and would neither permit it because He is
absolutely good, or, because He is absolutely powerful, would
eradicate it.
-
Suffering and evil,
in fact, exist.
-
Therefore, God, from
Whom evil cannot be concealed, cannot be absolutely good AND
absolutely powerful.
-
If absolutely good,
God would eradicate all evil and suffering --- but does not, and
therefore, while all good, He cannot be all powerful.
-
Conversely, if
absolutely powerful, then God could abolish evil and suffering,
but does not, and therefore, while all powerful, He cannot be
all good.
-
Hence, there is no
God, for by God we understand a Being perfect in goodness and
power.
|
Until
we are perfectly clear about this, we can go no further. Unless we
fully grasp the magnitude of this problem we cannot hope to
understand the reasons why men either fail to believe in God, or
having once believed, no longer do so. The occurrence, the
experience, of evil, as we had said in our opening, appears as
nothing less than a scandal to believers, and the cause of disbelief
in unbelievers. It need not be so. For our
part, we must be prepared to follow
St. Peter’s exhortation, “being ready always
to satisfy every one that asketh you a reason of that hope which is
in you” (1 St. Peter 3.15). Hence,
we begin.
Printable
PDF File
|