|
Personal Sanctity …
all that is left in a World without God
“I
pray not for the world, but for them whom Thou hast given Me”
(St. John 17:9)
The corruption
— on every conceivable level — of the world and in
the world (and most pernicious of all, within the Church
Herself: her cardinals, her bishops, her priests, her “modern sisters”
and “nuns” … even her present papacy!) — and especially in
the West (often, and accurately, referred to as the “Post-Christian
world”) — is nothing less than staggering. In the last 60 years
(unquestionably since the confluence of that socio-theological
miasma called Vatican II) we have encountered unprecedented levels
of what can only be called malignant decadence — spiritual, moral,
and social. It takes one’s breath away.
We have lost
God
More accurately, we have abandoned God
in favor of ourselves — and as a consequence, we have lost not only
ourselves, but our very identity, often painfully acquired
over the last 2000 years. We no longer recognize who we are
and what we are.
“Progress”
and “the perverse” have become synonymous
We have become — for all the wrong reasons
— self-loathing: detesting ourselves and the patrimony of a Catholic
culture through which our very identity both as individuals and
nations had been articulated.
Many hate the Church and a significant element
within the Church hates the Church, remaining within
Her as a cancer in its host. Western Christian culture is repudiated,
ridiculed, and contemned as anachronistic, imperialistic, homophobic,
racist, and misogynistic.
Repudiating the true God as inimical
to our passions and perversions, we have made our own gods, and
they are many — in fact, as many as we are ourselves. Women are
taught — indoctrinated really — to hate men and everything they
deem “patriarchal.”
Everything that pertains to our loins, or more
accurately, the loins of others — especially of the same gender
— has supplanted, displaced, and superseded the numinous, anything
authentically divine, and most especially, the holy. The very terms
have been relegated to the periphery of polite discourse, when not
entirely expurgated from it.
The world has fled God into the illusion of
a utopian garden that is a desiccated dessert. It is populated by
fictions and the rim of the horizon of our desires is the pretension
that there is an end called satisfaction instead of an endlessly
recursive vanishing point.
We find few paradigms of holiness in this City
of Man — sadly, not even among many of our priests, and, more tragically
still, even fewer among our bishops. To what, then, shall we strive
to attain in this increasingly lonely place we call life without
Christ? What vision are we presented, and to what end are we called?
Mother Teresa, in an interview some years ago,
explained the obvious. Rational persuasion, logical coherence, even
the most impassioned homily will not bring a person to conversion,
to Christ, and therefore to the Church. One thing only is capable
of this monumental task: example; the example of holiness
that we encounter in others that becomes the impetus to emulation:
we want to be like them. And they are like Christ.
We are sadly lacking in example as Catholics.
How often do we feel compelled to say to ourselves, “I want to be
like her, like him!” when we observe an act, some instance, of holiness
that overwhelms us in its simplicity? What examples, what paradigms,
do we confront in our lives in Christ that compel us to holiness?
We must not confuse the exemplary with the popular,
nor must we confuse it with carefully orchestrated events intended
to inspire us. The exemplary is unrehearsed and has no concomitant
agendum that is concealed within it. It is utterly spontaneous!
And therefore, we sense, utterly genuine.
The Leaven
of the World
What historical figures in our lives as Catholics
attain to this extraordinary state of the exemplary that
motivates men and women to imitation? To what are we exposed
that motivates us not to the common and ordinary, but to the uncommon
and exemplary? What do we see before us that calls us beyond ourselves
and beyond the gray and geometric sterility of the world to what
lies beyond it?
In a word, where is the differentiation
between the Church and the world, the common and the extraordinary,
the profane and the sacred? Let us be truthful and acknowledge the
obvious: the world has permeated the Church to such an extent that
we can no longer coherently differentiate the two except upon the
most tenuous of distinctions. Increasingly the agenda of the Church
is the agenda of the world. This is not the leaven
Christ spoke of. It is the leaven of the world; the leaven of infinitely
deep and unimaginably hostile places that we pretend do not exist.
Personal Sanctity
First, let us understand this with complete
clarity: we cannot attain to sanctity apart from the
Church and Her Sacraments. We cannot become holy schismatics, that
is to say, apart from the Church which is the Body
of Christ. However sterile we have found it since the spurious
and self-promoting euphoria of Vatican II … however trampled the
Vineyard and however littered with discarded and never-to-be-revised
Roman Missals, Religious habits, Chapel Veils, Priestly collars,
Roman Cassocks, kneelers … even the centrality of the Eucharistic
Presence of Christ, and an understanding of the Mass as a Sacrifice;
however grotesquely crippled and contorted the buildings we call
our “Churches” have become — more redolent of civic auditoriums
than Sanctuaries, there … there … abides the Living God,
hidden in Tabernacles we often do not see and only find with much
difficulty. He is there! However much we shunt Him
aside as both an ecumenical and chronological embarrassment, all
the litter of what has been discarded cannot conceal Him from us.
He beckons us, and even under the most humiliating circumstances,
we can look upon Him Who ever looks upon us.
Apart from the Church, the Most Blessed Sacrament
of the Altar, and the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass … we can do
nothing, become nothing, worthy of the Most Precious Blood poured
out for us upon that Altar. To be holy we must be part of the Church
for the Church, as we have said, is the Body of Christ, and
He Who is the Head of the Body is God Himself. Christ Jesus. God
Alone is Holy — and it is He Who participates His holiness
to us that we may be, in the most clear way possible, what we were
created to be; what we essentially are, despite the filth
of sin that covers it, obscures it, and defaces it: the imago
Dei, the image of God Himself!
In this wasteland barren of spires and empty of cloisters, ugly,
squat, geometric and concrete, Bauhaus pretensions emerged from
the rubble of “clustered” demolished churches (Churches without
anyone left to worship in them — one
of the many “successes” of Vatican II). They are no longer grand
structures striving to equal the soaring Faith of men and women
in heights contiguous to Heaven itself … but stooped, square, economical
structures that could as well be mortuaries (or athletic facilities,
commercial structures, municipal offices —
“functional” things that could, in an instant, reflexively duplicate
any of the above in need.
“Faith Communities?”
Indeed, we no longer have “churches” as such
— but in some paroxysm of needless novelty
we now have “Faith Communities” —
only parenthetically “Catholic” lest they offend broad ecumenical
sensitivities, for are there not other “Faith Communities”
distinct from, if often antithetical, even inimical, to the Catholic
Faith? By a “Church” we immediately understand something quite different
from a “Mosque”, a “Synagogue”, a “Temple”, or a “Kingdom Hall”.
Understood as a “Faith Community,” a Catholic Church is no
different from any of these. In an age of unbridled ecumenism are
they any less “Faith Communities” than our own, we implicitly,
even necessarily ask, not just minimizing but marginalizing the
unique mission and commission of the Church established by Christ
upon Saint Peter? If they were established by Muhammed, or Lao Tzu,
or Martin Luther, are not such “Faith Communities” equally acceptable
to God in the sweeping logic of ecumenism?
If indeed they are, then the crucifixion of
Christ on the Cross is emptied of all value and meaning. He died
for no reason if every “Faith Community” is the way to salvation.
His death was not necessary in the economy of salvation: hence He
died needlessly ... even gratuitously. This, of course, is a scandal
to the very Gospel He Himself proclaimed. “I am the way, and the
truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by Me.”
12
But in the malformed logic of ecumenism, even if other “Faith Communities”
despise the Triune God of Catholics and hold to other gods, are
they not equal expressions of man’s faith and legitimate
venues of salvation? In the “correct” atmosphere of post-Vatican
II theology, would we dare to assert that they are not? “All
roads lead to Rome” … that lead away from Rome — and
every paradigm of the holy, however contradictory, is deemed legitimate
and authentic, and the end of each is the same: Heaven and salvation.
Saint, heretic, infidel, and atheist alike go to God. The Catholic
Church has no corner on salvation. She is now simply one among many,
and Christ erred in proclaiming Himself, “the way, and the truth,
and the life,” and deceived us in insisting that, “No man cometh
to the Father, but by Me.”
“Spreading
our Tent Pegs ...”?
We are so damnably democratic … We must
“spread our tent pegs,” we are told, to be inclusive of all
— even if God is not. The strange thing, however, about “spreading
our tent pegs” is that the wider, the more inclusive, the more “horizontal”,
they become, the lower the apex of the tent. We achieve the horizontal
at the expense of the vertical. We sacrifice the magnificent height
to accommodate the factious width. Ask any camper. Even happy ones.
Eventually the fabric rips and the structure collapses. Most often
in the rain. And in great ruin. The “stitching” did not, could not,
hold this multiplicity of opposing forces however benevolent or
brainless our intentions.
Accompanying this ecumenical impulse was, necessarily,
theological ambiguity. How, otherwise, hope to bring hoped-for consensus
out of conflicting doctrines? It is this ambiguity that afflicts
ambo and podium alike in nominally Catholic institutions. In matters
of Faith, morals, and doctrine, it is rather like equivocating on
geometric postulates or axioms; or in mathematics holding in abeyance
quantitative relationships that are otherwise held to necessarily
obtain between integers.
Much like Dostoyevsky we reach a point where
we declare,
“To me that 2+2=4 is sheer insolence. I admit
that twice two makes four is an excellent thing, but if we are to
give everything its due, twice two makes five is sometimes a very
charming thing too.” (Notes from Underground)
This is largely the state of Catholic theology,
and, eo ipso, Catholic homiletics. We are no longer
— I repeat: no longer
(for once, and for a very long time we were … prior to Vatican II)
— certain of just what Holy Mother the
Church teaches, given this priest or that theologian and whether
it was Wednesday or Thursday. “Officially” She teaches “this”, but
depending on the audience She — or better
yet, and to be fair, Her spokesman in the person of a priest,
nun, sister, bishop, pope, or theologian —
proposes, or at least appears to suggest the contrary
— or openly rebels against it! For the
average Catholic layman or laywoman, they: the bishop, the priest,
the Religious, are the consecrated symbols of utter fidelity to
the Church, and for that reason it is a scandalous state of affairs.
How then do
we live our lives as Catholics — not post-Catholics
in a post-Christian world?
How do we live our Catholic lives as
they had been fervently lived for 2000 years prior to the insipid,
diffident, confused and eclectic — and at times even implicitly
pantheistic — impulses and subsequent teachings that emerged from
Vatican II, an unnecessary Council which effectively and efficiently
tore down the edifice of Catholicism as distinct, distinguishable,
and unique? As a way of life? In other words, lacking visible
paradigms of sanctity, how do we go about living lives of holiness
amid the detritus of so much we once considered sacred and that
now litters the ecclesiastical landscape of the Modern Church
or the American Church or the European Church — all
of which are to be conflated into one ecclesiastical body that appears
to articulate itself as distinct from the Roman Catholic
Church? In practical terms, it is an increasingly autonomous
body. We see this most strikingly today in Germany.
Shall we go
more frequently to Mass?
This is an obvious paradigm from another and
past generation. It once was true, but if we are remorselessly
candid, it is no longer so. How often do we go to Mass and
leave no more enlightened or fervid than when we had entered? Much
of what was distinctively and historically Catholic is no longer
there. “God loves you. The weather is great. You are all going to
Heaven (and your dog, too). Be nice. Shalom. Go in peace.” If we
are honest we cannot leave fast enough.
How about
the Sacrament of Penance — Confession?
... now called the Rite of Reconciliation
practiced face to face in a room with well-appointed and comfortable
chairs strangely reminiscent of a psychotherapist’s office? The
bulletin indicates that it is only available 45 minutes per
week or “by appointment” … as with a “therapist”. Frankly,
this is not much of an option, especially since the evisceration
of the concept of Mortal Sin (a term no longer in use because no
longer applicable) and the paucity of “real” sinners like you and
me.
What about
a Spiritual Director?
Good luck finding one at all, let alone one
who knows and will give you the mind of the Church
— rather than currently prevailing spiritual trends. Once again,
we effectively encounter, “God loves you. The weather is great.
You are going to Heaven (and your dog, too). Be nice. Shalom.
Go in peace.”
Perhaps we
Should Go to Medjugorje to listen to the “Seers” of the “Gospa”?
The “Seers,” beginning June 24, 1981 — youngsters
then, adults now, some 34 years later — surely have an answer somewhere
in the thousands of appearances of the “Gospa” (Mary).
1 Make expensive travel arrangements through them to
visit Medjugorje (including hotels, meals, and even meeting with
one of the “Seers” themselves) and watch your rosary turn into gold!
You will hear much of the pronouncements of Vatican II validated
by the Mother of God Herself, such as:
“Before God all the faiths are identical.
God governs them like a king in his kingdom.” All sufferings are
equal in hell; and Mirjana quotes the Gospa as telling her that
people begin feeling comfortable in hell. … When the Madonna is
asked about the title, “Mediatrix of all graces,” she replies, “I
do not dispose of all graces.” 2
Perhaps the “Gospa” will reveal the way of
holiness to you, although her track record over the past three decades
(and thousands of “appearances”) has been uniformly dismal
in the way of predictions and has led to open schism with the local
bishop who insists (with the Church) that the “Gospa” and her six
now-middle-age confederates are not authentic (yes,
despite the organized parish visits, in direct disobedience
to the Church, with your local priest you can make a “pilgrimage”
to a site condemned as spurious by Rome.)
What then?
What is Left?
Personal Sanctity. Apart from
any organized approach to holiness though the Mass (and the
incredibly bad music that is a perpetual distraction from it), or
Confession (barely extant), or sound Spiritual Direction (almost
universally absent) there is one venue, and one alone that is open
to you in these sterile, confused, contradictory, and tepid times
in which the Church appears as clear and distinct as a Microsoft
hologram: the commitment to personal sanctity guided by the Lives
of the Saints, rather than disaffected theologians. “You
are surrounded by a Cloud of Witnesses”, we are told 3
who have gone before you and have arrived at genuine sanctity, at
complete and indissoluble union with God in Heaven. Let them
— by their words and by their example — be our teachers
who had taught and guided the Church for two millennia.
Personal Sanctity requires effort. You must
come to know the mind of the Church and authentic Catholic
doctrine and dogma. That is to say, you must be catechized.
“But I went to CCD!” you protest. “And what did you learn?” I will
ask. “Why did God create you?” And you will have no answer. In a
word, you learned nothing despite the expensive, glossy textbooks
your parents had to pay for, and which were far, far, more pictorial
than substantial. They were … trendy. Empty. Worthless. And even
back then, you knew it. Indeed, your CCD teacher knew
as much about the Faith as you did. Catechesis has not been an important
agendum to your local bishop; even while it should be the most
preeminent as that upon which all things subsequent depend.
Immerse yourself in authentic Catholic doctrine
— and assiduously avoid anything , even with (or without)
an Imprimatur and/or Nihil Obstat that post-dates
1950.The Imprimatur and/or Nihil Obstat are
no longer any guarantee that what you read is consistent with the
mind and historical teachings of the Church. Once they were legitimate
stamps of approval as consistent with the Magisterium of the Church,
but they have long ceased to be so. Open the first few pages of
any ostensibly Catholic book and look for the date of the first
printing. This will tell you much in the way of their authenticity
and reliability as instruments appropriate for the formation of
a Catholic Conscience. If it has been printed following 1950, politely
put it down despite the rave reviews of any nominally Catholic source,
to say nothing of any secular source.
In a famous line from the movie “The Exorcist”
(based on fact) by William Peter Blatty, the elderly Father Merrin
warns the much younger Father Karras who is suffering a crisis of
Faith that, “He is a liar, the demon is a liar. He will
lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack
us. The attack is psychological, Damien. And powerful. So don't
listen, remember that, do not listen.”
By and large, Catholic literature dealing with
matters of Faith, Morals, Doctrine, and Dogma — either as pamphlets
or scholarly tomes had, prior to 1950, been carefully vetted by
competent Catholic theologians, priests, or bishops. They are credible
sources and remain so, although many have fallen out of print —
not from desuetude but as inconsistent with present and “popular”
Catholic thought, often percolated through Rogerian psychology.
The famous library at Alexandria 4
in classical antiquity was burned by the Muslims in 642 in an effort
to destroy any book incompatible with the Quran.” Modern” Catholic
theology and literature has engaged in a similar enterprise. Many
of the greatest books in Catholic literature are now only available
on-line or through small publishing houses committed to preserving
genuine Catholic teaching.
Apart from this treasury of 2000 years of Catholic
teaching we are left with incomplete, contradictory, and confusing
doctrines, not of the Church, but of dissident and disaffected theologians,
priests, and would-be “priestesses” who, in today's “inclusive”
seminaries are the instructors of what few candidates to the priesthood
we have left following their decimation by homosexual clerics. Richard
McBrien, Daniel Maguire, Hans Kung, Schillebeeckx, Congar, Rahner,
and Teilhard de Chardin — all voluble and nominally Catholic theologians
— three were collarless priests — are among the most eminent examples
of this theological dissidence, confusion, fiction, and heresy.
In their writings we are presented with a mixture of some truth
(to entice us) and many lies (to confuse us) reminiscent of the
stratagems of the demon in Blatty’s, The Exorcist. Where
is a Catholic to go to re-acquire an authentic Catholic identity
consistent with the Church and the Saints for 2000 years?
Grayscale
Memories
Many of us have them. We cleave to them as
to invaluable possessions, for they introduced us to an awareness
of the holy and of places other than Earth; to a belief in
things more profound than venal democratic institutions and more
enduring than perverse social issues. They opened the vista to things
eternal and resplendent in glory, to things holy that the world
could not possibly sully and debase because of the ontological distance
that separated them, a distance as great as sanctity from sin. They
are in carefully kept albums from a time of innocence, and inscribed
in the Family Bible placed beside a statue of Mary the Mother of
God. They are indelibly impressed in our memories; our First Holy
Communions, May Processions, the Baptisms of our children, and on
the memorial cards of those we love and who now live, please God,
in a place called Paradise, forever beyond this jaded Earth.
So How Do
We Get Back?
A soul at a time, beginning with our own.
Let us look at a few fundamental concepts with
which we ought to familiarize ourselves if we are committed to persevering
toward Personal Sanctity. Once we have acquired these, we have the
tools through which to articulate our own lives, whatever our vocation
in life, to accord with the mind of Christ and the mind of the Church
in matters dealing with the Faith, the Faith that has been faithfully
transmitted to us through the Deposit of Faith, for what we are
striving toward is nothing less than Exemplary Holiness
which itself is nothing more than Personal Sanctity.
Devotion to
Jesus Christ in the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar
We recognize that He
is there, really and truly, in His Body, Blood, Soul,
and Divinity. This the character of exemplary Catholicism: the recognition
of God Himself in the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity really
and truly present to us in the Tabernacle. Without His Presence,
without Him, the building we call a Church is nothing but a meaningless
and empty edifice. He is there! And He awaits you.
Anytime of the day or night. For the most part He is left alone
and unrecognized. We do not kneel before Him, but have the hubris
to stand as before an equal! Is that how you will approach Him in
the Last Judgment? We do not have the humility to genuflect when
we pass before Him, acknowledging Him … and yet we would not dare
pass a mere man we know without greeting him with some gesture of
recognition …
Frequent,
but Discerning (worthy) Reception of Holy Communion:
You are familiar with the
spectacle of everyone going to Holy Communion as though there
were no sinners in the pews. This indiscriminate partaking
of the Bread of Angels with no Examination of Conscience
prior to approaching Christ in Holy Communion is itself a Mortal
Sin if one is aware of an unconfessed Mortal sinned that has not
been absolved in the Tribunal of Penance (Holy Confession). In the
state of Mortal Sin and not sufficiently cognizant of the true and
real Presence of Christ in the sacred species of Holy Communion,
it is an act of blasphemy and therefore the death of the soul
in conspectu Dei (in the sight of God), for Saint Paul is very
clear: “For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh
judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord.”
5 Most often, apart from ignorance, the source of this sin
is the Capital Sin of Pride which refuses to constrain us to
conspicuously remain in the pews in recognition of our unworthiness,
through Mortal Sin, to receive Holy Communion — when everyone else
is. Even if Pope Francis in his Joy of Love (Amoris Laetitia)
deems it acceptable in second, third, or fourth … “unions” …
of those “living in God’s grace,” … adultery notwithstanding.
Recognition
of the real Distinction between Venial Sins and Mortal Sins:
This is not the venue of
a discussion of the distinction between Mortal and Venial Sin. Suffice
it to say that a Mortal Sin must contain all three
of the following: (1) the matter of the sin must be serious, (2)
one wills to commit the sin, and (3) one commits the
Mortal Sin. A Venial Sin is not serious in nature, is committed
without a full understanding of the detrimental nature of the sin,
and/or is not committed with the total consent of the will. Venial
sins do not preclude participation in Holy Communion. Mortal Sins
do.
Devotion to
Mary:
One preeminent hallmark
of Catholic piety is the love of Mary, Mother of God. Devotion to
Mary is the sine qua non of the fully lived Catholic life.
Her place in the economy of salvation is absolutely singular: she
alone gave flesh (her flesh) to the Word Incarnate. Hence “every
generation shall call me blessed” 6
She is our Mother.7
Recognition
of the Reality of Heaven and Hell
It is the Sin of
Presumption to assume that, as a matter of course, we will
go to Heaven and stand before the Beatific Vision of God eternally.
Even Saint Paul exhorted us to work out our salvation “with fear
and trembling.” 8
Despite the total absence
and silence at the ambo of any mention of Hell, it is quite real
and many go there. 9
The Four Final
Things: Death, Judgment, Heaven or
Hell
In many old graveyards
you will find the following inscribed upon many humble markers:
“Sum quod eris, fui quod sis” — essentially, “As you are
I once was, as I am you will one day be.” Understand your mortality,
recognize the inevitable, and act accordingly. Remember the distinction
between “life” and “life everlasting” … however it will be lived
… in Heaven or Hell. Have always before you the Last Four Things
that will surely come to pass instead of the present “popular” things
in vogue with a Church that has become heavily feminized in every
aspect of its “Liturgy” and social teachings.
Never Pass
a Church without recognizing Christ within:
“Gloria tibi, Domine!”
(Glory to You, Lord!), or “Laus tibi, Domine” (Praise
to You, Lord!). A devout Catholic always makes some sign of recognition
of Christ in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar when he passes
a Church. This is accompanied by tracing the Sign of the Cross on
our forehead or over our heart. When this becomes instinctual (as
it had been prior to Vatican II) it will assist us in recognizing
Who abides there and for what reason. It is the instinctive call
to holiness.
Receive Holy
Communion on your Knees
Remarkably, this is no
longer the norm in modern Novus Ordo masses. Saint Francis
himself, it is said, refused Holy Orders (becoming a priest) because
he did not think himself worthy to hold the Sacred Body of
Christ in his hands. You may be reproached by the
priest in your parish for not following the “approved posture” adopted
by the diocese or the USCCB. As Saint Peter responded to those who
discouraged his preaching the Gospel, “Is it better to obey God,
or men?” 10
For 2000 years Holy Communion was received this way, and nowhere
in the documents of Vatican II does it suggest otherwise. Would
you approach Christ in less an attitude of humility and adoration?
Do not fear being scorned for what others may ridicule as your
“sanctimony”. It is Christ Himself you kneel before! What
thought of anyone else should occupy your mind?
For God’s sake get on your knees!
Honor the
Saints and Martyrs
They, not your “Parish Council” are your faithful
and eternal friends. If they are no longer honored in the present
Martyrology, honor them still, and invoke their aid and protection.
Remain in their company, who behold the face of God in Heaven.
It is the Company to which you are called!
Christ Himself promised us that the very Gates
of Hell will not prevail against the Church. And yes, the Church,
as we limply excuse ourselves, is “made up of sinners.”
But it is also made up of saints. That is our universal
vocation: to be nothing less than saints, whatever our earthly vocation.
But we are not saints yet. As Saint Francis famously said, “Let
us begin. For up to now we have done nothing.” Do not be afraid
of sanctity. It is the very character of the image in which you
have been created.
Whatever the
Church now suffers on earth it has suffered before — if not on so
vast a scale
And that is precisely why your
call to sanctity is so vital. You must pursue the sanctity
that the Church at present appears to have lost, or spurns as too
onerous … too “otherworldly” in this “Age of Man”. You must
be the sign of contradiction that is the Sign of the Cross, and
Him Who was crucified upon it for you. You must be in the world
but not of the world, for Saint John warns us,
“Love not the world, nor the things which
are in the world. If any man love the world, the charity
of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world is the
concupiscence of the flesh, and the concupiscence of the eyes, and
the pride of life, which is not of the Father, but is of the world.
And the world passes away, and the concupiscence thereof: but he
that doth the will of God, abides forever.”
11
Spurn the world — and the empty love and praise
of the world! Keep all that is holy before you and this day
begin to dwell already in the Mansion prepared for you by Christ
before the foundation of the world.
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable
PDF Version
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
_______________________________
1
See
https://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/medjugorje-private-revelation-and-the-seer-ing-truth.htm,
2
https://www.crisismagazine.com/2012/the-devil-and-medjugorje
3
Hebrews 12.1
4 “In AD 642, Alexandria
was captured by the Muslim army of Amr ibn al `Aas. Several later
Arabic sources describe the library's destruction by the order of
Caliph Omar. Bar-Hebraeus, writing
in the 13th century, quotes Omar as saying to Yaḥyā al-Naḥwī:
“If those books are in agreement with the Quran, we have no need
of them; and if these are opposed to the Quran, destroy them.”
Later scholars are skeptical of these stories, given the range
of time that had passed before they were written down and the political
motivations of the various writers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria
5 I
Cor. 11.29
6 St. Luke 1.48
7 St. John 19.26
8 Philippians 2.12, 2 Cor.
13.15.
9 St. Mat. 7.13
10 Acts 5.29
11 1 John 2.15-17
12 St. John 14.6
Note:
An invaluable source for historically authentic Catholic teaching
including the writings of the Church Fathers can be found
at
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/
and
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/
The indispensable
Baltimore Catechism — universally used by the Catholic
Church until it was discontinued following Vatican II can be found
(and downloaded as a PDF) at:
https://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/baltimore_catechism.pdf
. It presents a clear, concise, and readily understandable
presentation of our Holy Catholic Faith. We encourage you
to explore it.
_____________________
Photo Credit: Wikipedia
Totally
Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith
entrusted to the Holy See in Rome
“Scio
opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti
verbum Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
“I
know your works ... that you have but little power,
and yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My
Name.”
(Apocalypse 3.8)
Copyright © 2004 - 2026
Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless
otherwise stated, permission is granted by the Boston
Catholic Journal for the copying and distribution of
the articles and audio files under the following conditions:
No additions, deletions, or changes are to be made to
the text or audio files in any way, and the copies may
not be sold for a profit. In the reproduction, in any
format of any image, graphic, text, or audio file, attribution
must be given to the Boston Catholic Journal.
|
|
