The Last Victim of Abortion
when I first knew about the baby ... my baby, that a casual
sexual interlude had produced, and I had no money to help my casual
friend in her quest to have an abortion when she asked me for it. If
I had money at the time, I would have given it to her
— to remove that terrible inconvenience to my life at 15 (and hers at
That was 1965.
I was 17
when I agreed with my next girlfriend to end the life of the
baby in her by abortion.
That was 1967.
Neither of these two women ever married to this day — and neither ever
had children. But I did. And no day goes by when I do not think of both
of those children, my children, I had sacrificed to my selfishness —
45 years ago.
It is right that so much attention should be given to the frightful
and deliberately hidden consequences of mothers who have chosen, been
induced, persuaded or forced to have an abortion, who have killed their
babies for any reason — most especially “convenience”. They
bore the child. It moved within them. They were totally
present at the
that suctioned out the remains of the baby that had been snipped apart
while still in them, limb by limb — while still alive.
The Last Victim
But it seems that no one gives thought
to the child's father and the consequences of his decision to
agree with and even be instrumental in the killing of the child —
who would have lived if he really wanted it to. The baby, after
all, was “flesh of his flesh” and as much his as the mother’s. Somehow
the father is left out in the cold correctitude that accompanies every
abortion as though his decision and complicity had nothing to do with
this terrible event, an event that would change him forever, too — leaving
the unhealed wound that would never become a scar because it still bleeds.
Every day I wipe up the blood of my child,
much like Mary did the Blood of her Son Jesus after He was scourged
in the movie, The Passion of the Christ. Remember that sequence?
I wonder what Mary did with that Precious Blood? I do not even know
what I do with it. I try to offer it up to God as some
kind of vicarious atonement in the innocent flesh and blood of another
human being for my sin, for it covers me with unbearable guilt — a guilt
that I do not know how any human being can bear. Yet somehow I do. I
must. I cannot make it go away. The towel is never wrung out, either
in my heart or my conscience. Every day I wipe up that “precious blood”
— and have no where to put it. It just seeps into my conscience and
sustains my sorrow every bit as much as it would have sustained my babies'
I have other children now. Children that are alive in this world. I
have never told them of their brothers or sisters — brothers or sisters
whose lives I had chosen to end. How can I? How frightened they
would be thinking that perhaps their own lives had also been forfeit,
and that by grace or fortune or fate ... had been spared. How
would they look into my eyes? How would they see me then?
The Dad whom they know would lay down
his life for them ... had once taken the lives of their brothers or
sisters! Is this the real Dad?
How could I explain it to them?
I cannot justify it. I cannot explain
away this horrific complicity as merely the result of “extenuating
circumstances”, or tell them that I was too young to be held responsible.
I was not! I knew full well what I was doing. And so does every
father who has done murder. Do not be fooled by the clinically sanitized
death rattle of that charnel house called Planned Parenthood, that would
have you believe that they are offering you a “service” for your benefit
(... and for a fee, of course).
life will be better. You will be free to either resume or pursue your
own career, to continue studying, to go back to all the things you were
doing before this terrible “complication” put a bump in the road to
your happiness. That “protrusion” in your life can be easily remedied.
Let us simply remove it, and then you can go on as though it never occurred.
Now, will that be cash or credit ...?”
It is a lie. Your life will never be as
it once was. You cannot simply expunge this horrible episode from your
own time line as though writing revisionist history or a carefully culled
biography. It happened, and you will always know it, always remember
it, always carry that date as an obit in your heart and soul — like
a birthday that became a funeral each year. It never goes away. Subsequent
children do not erase it — if you have "exercised your right to choose",
and opted for the baby and not the bonus at the end of the year.
Did the dissolute and hallucinogenic society
of the 1960’s (even as much as today's) make it “feel” an acceptable
thing to do 45 years ago? Yes. There would be no frowning upon this
avante gard act in keeping with the selfishness of the Sixties.
All the (then "underground") "contacts" were, after all, from the universities.
They were “educated” people. They were more than eager to help. In fact,
center was in a Protestant Church in Boston (the Old South Church, I
think). Surely, it seemed to a young man of 15 or 17, that if
they were willing to provide this “underground service” at a
“church”, wasn't it an indication that what they were doing was at least
“okay” in a “progressive” society — and being located in a “church”,
acceptable to God?
Did that ease my conscience? Absolutely.
That an “educated class” was allowed, encouraged, to offer their services
through something so benign as a “church” was sufficient to anesthetize
my conscience. After all, at so young an age I was not then “educated”
— and they were. They were the best and the brightest. Why, even
an Episcopal “church” helped them! What more assurance did I need that
what I agreed to do was acceptable ... even a “social service”?
We've Come a Long Way ... Baby
The government at that time still had
some semblance of a collective and historical national conscience and
considered this “service” illegal, because it was deemed murder. We've
come a long way since then. Do you remember the cigarette commercials
of the 1960’s, showing a young woman finally free to choose to
smoke with the punch line following her liberation: “you've come
a long way, baby!” And so have I ...
But the way is no easier because the government now holds that murder
pertains only to the adjudicated “guilty” where the plaintiff and the
defendant meet face to face, or at least the remains of the victim can
be produced as evidence of the crime. Our own children are another story.
They can be murdered with impunity — even government assistance — as
long as no more than 1/4 of their little bodies remain in their mother.
A mere moment longer and it miraculously becomes a “child” — and not
just “tissue”. Beyond that, the abortionist becomes a murderer if he
plies the ghastly tools of his trade.
But not the moment before. Life measured
in inches, centimeters ... ?
I think about these things.
Simply because “the government” now holds that no crime is committed
in abortion, that murder is not done — is absolutely useless to me.
It does nothing to ease my conscience, nothing to attenuate my guilt,
nothing to assuage my sorrow. Increasingly the government tells me that
things that I instinctively feel are wrong — even terribly wrong
— are perfectly okay. Normal. Natural. Even while everything inside
me screams that it is so obviously wrong, not normal, not natural!
For 45 years I feared to open my mouth. Why? Have you ever stood in
prayerful protest outside an abortion “clinic”? One step, one word out
of line, and the police — at abortion clinics often incomprehensibly
brutal toward prayerful protestors while on their “paid details” (paid,
of course, by the clinic) — will demonstrate why in gratuitously
violent terms. In America, now as never before, you do not “go along
to get along”, but too often “go along or go to jail.”
So I sit, 45 years later, and fear even to voice my sorrow, openly express
my guilt. It is not “correct”. It goes against government policy. It
does not sit well with prevailing opinion (at least what the media tell
me is wide-spread and prevailing opinion, although, strangely, I do
not find it among those with whom I speak) and perversity as policy.
I begin to believe them less, and trust them less. Incredibly, it is
the social “scientist”, the lawyer, a government agency, who determines
— with the clinical pathos of authority — the “viability of life” and
the terms under which alone it is “deemed” a life.
My heart tells me otherwise. It has told
me something quite different for the past 45 years. Somehow the sorrow,
grief, and loss of the father is completely omitted from the narrative
— that speaks to me every day of my life. My two children from that
time are with God. Perhaps ... perhaps ... I will one day be, too —
and when I see my children, what will I say to them?
What will you say to yours?
The Boston Catholic
Journal gratefully acknowledges the permission granted to publish this
Printable PDF Version