“Failures”? …“Failures”?
... I really bristled at this.
What hypocrisy!
What hogwash!
Who can believe that? Who in Boston?
In Brighton? On Planet Earth?
He
came here, to Boston, in 2003 — 15 years ago — to “correct”
the criminal behavior, the homosexual deviancy that infested the
priesthood and raped our children — and especially festered at Saint
John’s Seminary where, if you could not pass the Color Pink, you
would never see Holy Orders. Why? Because it was the seedbed of
the homosexual culture that infiltrated, dominated, shamed, and
broke the Church in Boston — and then the rest of the world.
Where
do you first look when attempting to uncover widespread crime? How
about a Criminal Organization? If it is theft, a gang of thieves!
If it is political corruption, the State House and the Legislature!
If it
is perversion in the priesthood — how about the seminary?
“Elementary,
my dear Watson.”
NEVER AGAIN?
He came. He saw. He “conquered” —
and left Saint John’s Seminary as filthy as it was when he arrived
as the Vatican’s “White Knight” in 2003. And now he wishes
to “affirm our commitment that these
failures will never be repeated” even as he himself now stands
in the shadow of
complicity.
Did he
not say something of that nature 15 years ago?
He is,
reportedly, putting together yet ANOTHER
... “PANEL”
... to investigate what was already “investigated”
long before. According to
NECN,
“Cardinal
Sean O’Malley from the Archdiocese of Boston says he’s not able
to verify or disprove these allegations,
but wants the investigation to start as soon as possible
… Cardinal O’Malley said in a statement,
“The allegations made this
week are a source of serious concern to me as Archbishop of Boston.”
He
must be scratching his head: “Haven’t I heard something like
this before?” As we see, O’Malley is STILL only
tentatively scandalized by homosexual predators
in the Episcopacy and the priesthood! He is yet
— some 15 years after the loathsome scandal broke in Boston — simply
“unable
to verify or disprove these
allegations”,
you understand.
No, you are not in some parallel dimension. Fifteen years
after this nauseating and pandemic putrescence in the Church burst
like a vesicle ... a boil ... from a diseased Body — O’Malley
is not yet ready (as Francis famously was not in the
priest-bishop-homosexual pedophilia scandal in Chile) to give credence
to the such ... “allegations”
... however many, and however grave the scandal to the Faithful.
Perhaps he misunderstood Christ:
“But
he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in
Me,
it
were better
for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck,
and that
he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.”
(Saint Matthew 18.6)
Let us offer our
clueless Cardinal in absentia … a few clues obvious to most
Catholics, but apparently opaque to most cardinals:
Doesn’t a cardinal or
bishop have to be a priest first? And do not priests
first have to be seminarians? And do not seminarians
attend places like Saint John’s Seminary? “Elementary,
my dear Watson”.
How about “starting that the beginning”,
O’Malley? You know, like the people responsible for admitting
candidates to the seminary? And the teachers who instruct
them? The bishops who consecrate them? Surely none of them
were among the homosexual predators ... too?
You MUST have been there before.
It is on Lake Street in Brighton. Of course we know that you share
the habits of Francis — who is enamored of you — by living in a
simple residence, and maybe you cook your own meals, too? But how
about the weightier matters? The Faith? The Flock? Remember them?
“The Little Ones” … you remember them, too?
Ask yourself: when was the last
time you saw O’Malley? At a photo-op with Francis?
You have listened to his “sermons” — mostly monetary appeals — ON
RECORDINGS in your parish — in place of a homily embodied in a physical
presence?
Did you
ever write him about an abuse in your parish? If you did, you never
heard from him. You heard from his “secretary” who told you that
Father so-and-so was held in O’Malley’s “highest esteem”. In other
words, GFY! This is a Catholic Journal so I will not spell it out
for you.
“INSINCERITY”
iS tOO kIND, tOO gENEROUS, a wORD
O’Malley is the
poster boy of all the insincerity we now find in the Church. He
talks the talk. He kind of looks the part. But face
it, by now it is apparent that he is most likely one of the Old-Boys
from the 60’s culture that devastated the Church and has no real
intention of correcting a vicious crime. Wasn't he famously brought
in 20 years ago to clean this mess up? But it hadn't been “cleaned
up”. It festered like a boil until the suppuration (the foul and
putrescent pus) finally burst in a scandalously ugly mess that no
amount of editorial “sanitizing” could keep the reek away from any
sentient being. And you come again to rectify it — a second
time? We suggest that it is time to
“Lawyer-up”,
O'Malley!
The horror that emerged from Pennsylvania will teach
“the
hierarchy”
nothing: 300 priest-homosexual-predators
identified (so far) and over 1000 children — not to count
the pre-and-post-pubescent, the seminarians, the young adults preyed
upon by priest, bishop, and cardinal alike. “Surely the “hierarchy
would have acted had it known ...” but the problem was
the hierarchy and the systematic cover-up of crimes too horrible,
too shameful to stain the pages of any Catholic journal.
Francis
— himself now suspect of cover-up should have acted — but
could not without indicting himself ... and very likely many
of his “closest advisors” like the homosexual apologist and pro
LBGT Father James Martin, S.J who Francis invited to speak in
Ireland at (of all things) the World meeting of Families
about
“Showing Welcome and
Respect in our Parishes for ‘LGBT’ People and their Families”
while at the same time denouncing “Homophobic pastors”. But
that would mean gathering the criminals and clapping them in irons!
Who, then … would “man” the emptying churches which, since Vatican
II, have been largely emptied of meaning anyway. If this concatenation
of absurdities does not point to the End of the World, as
some frightfully sober men suggest, it is, at the very least, the
End of Sanity in the World — at least the world inhabited
by rational Catholics ... whose Warden at the moment is the principal
Inmate.
“And no religion, too”
Salus animarum?
The Salvation of souls? That is last on the list of O’Malley, just
as it is last on the list of Francis. The Beatle’s song “Imagine”
invokes two things indispensable to both men from that hallucinogenic
era of the 60s: imagine a world of “the brotherhood of man
and no religion too?” This is the “Post-Conciliar”
Church. This is Vatican II. This is Francis — and, apparently, O’Malley.
God? Heaven? Hell? Salvation? All
such silliness was stamped out by Vatican II — and both men are
eminent products of that “Council” that became the ecclesiastical
equivalent of Dresden. Once again O’Malley comes, not as a shepherd,
but to collect the ashes of faith, mix them with the tears of the
sodomized, and somehow to mold a monument to this crushing horror
with the promise, yet again, that “these failures
will never be repeated.”
“Failures”?
You call them mere “failures”? How dare you?!
The rest
of us— your “Eminence”— call them our “Children”.
Vae vobis!
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable
PDF Version
