“Failures”? …“Failures”? ... I really bristled at this.
What
hypocrisy!
What hogwash!
Who can believe that? Who in Boston? In Brighton? On Planet
Earth?
He came here, to Boston, in 2003 — 15 years ago — to
“correct” the criminal behavior, the homosexual deviancy
that infested the priesthood and raped our children — and
especially festered at Saint John’s Seminary where, if you
could not pass the Color Pink, you would never see Holy
Orders. Why? Because it was the seedbed of the homosexual
culture that infiltrated, dominated, shamed, and broke the
Church in Boston — and then the rest of the world.
Where do you first look when attempting to uncover
widespread crime? How about a Criminal Organization? If it
is theft, a gang of thieves! If it is political corruption,
the State House and the Legislature!
If it is perversion in the priesthood — how about the
seminary?
“Elementary, my dear Watson.”
NEVER AGAIN?
He came. He saw. He “conquered” — and left Saint John’s
Seminary as filthy as it was when he arrived as the
Vatican’s “White Knight” in 2003. And now he wishes
to “affirm our commitment
that these failures will never be repeated” even as
he himself now stands in the shadow of
complicity.
Did he not say something of that nature 15 years ago?
He is, reportedly, putting together yet ANOTHER
... “PANEL”
... to
investigate what was already “investigated”
long before. According to
NECN,
“Cardinal
Sean O’Malley from the Archdiocese of Boston says he’s not
able to verify or disprove these allegations,
but wants the investigation to start as soon as possible
… Cardinal O’Malley said in a statement,
“The allegations made
this week are a source of serious concern to me as
Archbishop of Boston.”
He must be scratching his
head: “Haven’t I heard something like this before?” As we
see, O’Malley is STILL only tentatively
scandalized by homosexual predators in the Episcopacy and
the priesthood!
He is yet — some 15 years after the loathsome
scandal broke in Boston — simply “unable
to verify or disprove these allegations”,
you understand.
No, you are not in some parallel dimension. Fifteen
years after this nauseating and pandemic putrescence in
the Church burst like a vesicle ... a boil ... from a
diseased Body — O'Malley is not yet ready (as
Francis famously was not in the priest-bishop-homosexual
pedophilia scandal in Chile) to give credence to the
such ... “allegations”
... however many, and however grave the scandal to the
Faithful.
Perhaps he misunderstood Christ:
“But
he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that
believe in Me, it were
better for
him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and
that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.”
(Saint Matthew 18.6)
Let us offer our clueless
Cardinal in absentia … a few clues obvious to most
Catholics, but apparently opaque to most cardinals:
Doesn’t a cardinal or
bishop
have to be a priest first? And do not priests first
have to be seminarians? And do not seminarians attend
places like Saint John’s Seminary? “Elementary, my
dear Watson”.
How about “starting that the
beginning”, O’Malley? You know, like the people responsible
for admitting candidates to the seminary? And the
teachers who instruct them? The bishops who
consecrate them? Surely none of them were among the
homosexual predators ... too?
You MUST have been there
before. It is on Lake Street in Brighton. Of course we know
that you share the habits of Francis — who is enamored of
you — by living in a simple residence, and maybe you cook
your own meals, too? But how about the weightier matters?
The Faith? The Flock? Remember them? “The Little Ones” … you
remember them, too?
Ask yourself: when was the
last time you saw O’Malley? At a photo-op with
Francis? You have listened to his “sermons” — mostly
monetary appeals — ON RECORDINGS in your parish — in place
of a homily embodied in a physical presence?
Did you ever write him about
an abuse in your parish? If you did, you never heard from
him. You heard from his “secretary” who told you that Father
so-and-so was held in O’Malley’s “highest esteem”. In other
words, GFY! This is a Catholic Journal so I will not spell
it out for you.
“INSINCERITY”
iS tOO kIND, tOO gENEROUS a wORD
O’Malley is the poster boy
of all the insincerity we now find in the Church. He
talks the talk. He kind of looks the part. But
face it, by now it is apparent that he is most likely one of
the Old-Boys from the 60’s culture that devastated the
Church and has no real intention of correcting a vicious
crime. Wasn't he famously brought in 20 years ago to clean
this mess up? But it hadn't been “cleaned up”. It festered
like a boil until the suppuration (the foul and putrescent
pus) finally burst in a scandalously ugly mess that no
amount of editorial “sanitizing” could keep the reek away
from any sentient being. And you come again to
rectify it — a second time? We suggest that it
is time to
“Lawyer-up”,
O'Malley!
The horror that emerged from Pennsylvania will teach
“the
hierarchy”
nothing: 300 priest-homosexual-predators
identified (so far) and over 1000 children — not to
count the pre-and-post-pubescent, the seminarians, the young
adults preyed upon by priest, bishop, and cardinal alike.
“Surely the “hierarchy would have acted had it known ...”
but the problem was the hierarchy and the
systematic cover-up of crimes too horrible, too shameful to
stain the pages of any Catholic journal.
Francis — himself now
suspect of cover-up should have acted — but could
not without indicting himself ... and very likely many
of his “closest advisors” like the homosexual apologist and
pro LBGT Father James Martin, S.J who Francis invited
to speak in Ireland at (of all things) the World meeting
of Families about
“Showing Welcome
and Respect in our Parishes for ‘LGBT’ People and their
Families”
while at the same time denouncing “Homophobic pastors”.
But that would mean gathering
the criminals and clapping them in irons! Who, then …
would “man” the emptying churches which, since Vatican II,
have been largely emptied of meaning anyway. If this
concatenation of absurdities does not point to the End of
the World, as some frightfully sober men suggest, it is,
at the very least, the End of Sanity in the World —
at least the world inhabited by rational Catholics ... whose
Warden at the moment is the principal Inmate.
“And no religion, too”
Salus
animarum? The Salvation of souls? That is last on the
list of O’Malley, just as it is last on the list of Francis.
The Beatle’s song “Imagine” invokes two things
indispensable to both men from that hallucinogenic era of
the 60s: imagine a world of “the brotherhood of man
and no
religion too?” This is the “Post-Conciliar” Church. This is
Vatican II. This is Francis — and, apparently, O’Malley.
God? Heaven? Hell?
Salvation? All such silliness was stamped out by Vatican II
— and both men are eminent products of that “Council” that
became the ecclesiastical equivalent of Dresden. Once again
O’Malley comes, not as a shepherd, but to collect the ashes
of faith, mix them with the tears of the sodomized, and somehow
to mold a monument to this crushing horror with the
promise, yet again, that “these failures
will never be repeated.”
“Failures”? You call them mere “failures”? How
dare you?!
The rest of us— your “Eminence”— call them our “Children”.
Vae vobis!
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
September 3, 2018
Printable
PDF Version
