“Failures”?
…“Failures!”?
I really bristled at this
What unmitigated hypocrisy!
What Bull- ...“Copro”
(as
only Francis would say)!
Who
can believe that? Who in Boston? In Brighton? On Planet Earth?
He came here, to Boston, in 2003 — 15 years ago — to “correct”
the criminal behavior, the homosexual deviancy that infested the
priesthood and raped our children — and especially festered at Saint
John’s Seminary where, if you could not pass the Color Pink, you
would never see Holy Orders. Why? Because it was the seedbed of
the homosexual culture that infiltrated, dominated, shamed, and
broke the Church in Boston — and then the rest of the world.
Where
do you first look when attempting to uncover widespread crime? How
about a Criminal Organization? If it is theft, look for a gang of
thieves! If it is political corruption, look into the State House
and the Legislature!
If
it is perversion in the priesthood — how about Saint John’s
Seminary?
Never Again?
He
came. He saw. He “conquered” — and left Saint John’s Seminary as
filthy as it was when he arrived as the Vatican’s “White Knight”
in 2003. And now he wishes to “affirm our commitment that these
failures will never be repeated”
even as he himself now stands in the shadow of
complicity.
Did
he not say something of that nature 15 years ago?
He
is, reportedly, putting together yet ANOTHER
... “PANEL”
... to investigate what was already “investigated”
long before. According to
NECN,
“Cardinal
Sean O’Malley from the Archdiocese of Boston says he’s not able
to verify or disprove these allegations,
but wants the
investigation to start as soon as possible … Cardinal O’Malley
said in a statement, “The
allegations made this week are a source of serious concern to me
as Archbishop of Boston.”
He must be scratching his head:
“Haven’t I heard something like this before?” As we see,
O’Malley is still only tentatively scandalized
by homosexual predators in the Episcopacy and the priesthood!
15 years after the loathsome scandal broke in Boston — and
O’Malley is simply “unable
to verify or disprove these allegations”,
you understand. No,
you are not in some parallel dimension. Fifteen years after
this nauseating and pandemic putrescence in the Church burst like
a vesicle ... a boil ... from a diseased Body — O’Malley is
not yet ready (as Francis famously was not in the priest-bishop-homosexual
pedophilia scandal in Chile) to give credence to the such ... “allegations”
... however many, and however grave the scandal to the Faithful.
Perhaps he misunderstood Christ:
“But
he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that
believe in Me,
it
were better
for him that a millstone
should be hanged about his neck, and that he should
be drowned in the depth of the sea.”
(Saint Matthew 18.6)
Let us offer our clueless Cardinal
in absentia … a few clues obvious to most Catholics, but
apparently opaque to most cardinals:
Doesn’t a cardinal or bishop have
to be a priest first? And do not priests first have to be
seminarians? And do not seminarians attend places like
Saint John’s Seminary? “Elementary, my dear Watson”.
How about “starting that the beginning”,
O’Malley? You know, like the people responsible for admitting
candidates to the seminary? And the teachers who instruct
them? The bishops who consecrate them? Surely none of them
were among the homosexual predators ... too?
You must have been
there before. It is on Lake Street in Brighton. Of course we know
that you share the habits of Francis — who is enamored of you —
by living in a simple residence, and maybe you cook your own meals,
too? But how about the weightier matters? The Faith? The Flock?
Remember them? “The Little Ones” … you remember them, too?
Ask yourself: when was the last
time you saw O’Malley? At a photo-op with Francis?
You have listened to his “sermons” — mostly monetary appeals —
on audio recordings in your parish — in place of a homily
embodied in a physical presence?
Did you ever write him about an
abuse in your parish? If you did, you never heard from him. You
heard from his “secretary” who told you that Father so-and-so was
held in O’Malley’s “highest esteem”. In other words, GFY!
This is a Catholic Journal so I will not spell it out for you.
“Insincerity”
is too Kind, too Generous, a Word
O’Malley is the poster boy of all
the insincerity we now find in the Church. He talks the talk.
He kind of looks the part. But face it, by now it is apparent
that he is most likely one of the Old-Boys from the 60’s culture
that devastated the Church and has no real intention of correcting
a vicious crime. Wasn't he famously brought in 20 years ago to clean
this mess up? But it hadn't been “cleaned up”. It festered like
a boil until the suppuration (the foul and putrescent pus) finally
burst in a scandalously ugly mess that no amount of editorial “sanitizing”
could keep the reek away from any sentient being. And you
come again to rectify it — a second time? We suggest
that it is time to “Lawyer-up”,
O'Malley!
The horror that emerged from Pennsylvania will teach
“the
hierarchy”
nothing: 300 priest-homosexual-predators
identified (so far) and over 1000 children — not
to count the pre-and-post-pubescent, the seminarians, the young
adults preyed upon by priest, bishop, and cardinal alike. “Surely
the “hierarchy would have acted had it known ...” but the problem
was the hierarchy and the systematic cover-up of crimes too
horrible, too shameful to stain the pages of any Catholic journal.
Francis — himself now suspect of
cover-up should have acted — but could not without
indicting himself ... and very likely many of his “closest advisors”
like the homosexual apologist and pro LBGTQ+-÷ Father James Martin,
S.J who Francis invited to speak in Ireland at (of all things)
the World meeting of Families about
“Showing Welcome and
Respect in our Parishes for ‘LGBT’ People and their Families”
while at the same time denouncing “Homophobic pastors”. But
that would mean gathering the criminals and clapping them in irons!
Who, then … would “man” the emptying churches which, since Vatican
II, have been largely emptied of meaning anyway. If this concatenation
of absurdities does not point to the End of the World, as some frightfully
sober men suggest, it is, at the very least, the End of Sanity
in the World — at least the world inhabited by rational Catholics
... whose Warden at the moment is the principal Inmate.
“And no religion,
too”
Salus animarum? The Salvation
of souls? That is last on the list of O’Malley, just as it is last
on the list of Francis. The Beatle’s song “Imagine”
invokes two things indispensable to both men from that hallucinogenic
era of the 60s: imagine a world of “the brotherhood of man and
no religion too?” This is the “Post-Catholic-Conciliar Church.”
This is Vatican II. This is Francis — and, apparently, O’Malley.
God? Heaven? Hell? Salvation? All
such silliness was stamped out by Vatican II — and both men are
eminent products of that “Council” that became the ecclesiastical
equivalent of Dresden. Once again O’Malley comes, not as a shepherd,
but to collect the ashes of faith, mix them with the tears of the
sodomized, and somehow to mold a monument to this crushing horror
with the promise, yet again, that “these failures
will never be repeated.”
“Failures”?
You call them mere “failures”? How dare you!
The
rest of us— your “Eminence”— call them our “Children”.
Vae vobis!*
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
_____________________________________
* “Woe to you!”
(Saint Luke 11.42-52)
Printable PDF Version
