Pope Francis Entertains Term Limits on
the Children … twice
I divorce my wife (which
Francis now allows through a totally novel and terribly
convenient concept he calls his own “Personal Magisterium”
— a neologism denoting his illicit personal appropriation of power)
although official Church teaching for 2000 years expressly forbids it
— and I abandon my four children and take up another life which am I?:
a) A “Father Emeritus”
b) A “Husband Emeritus”
c) A “Provider Emeritus”
d) A “Protector Emeritus”
e) All of the above *
Did you never hear of
any of the above? Neither have we.
The title Pope is from
the Latin papa, which, in turn, is derived from the Greek
pappas, or Papa — specifically (and
significantly) a child's name for the more
formal “father”. The Pope has always been understood as the Father
to all Catholics.
is especially significant to me (and countless others in America and
elsewhere), for my father abandoned me and my brothers in our infancy.
We have never seen him. We have never heard from him. Ever.
grew up wondering what it was like to have a father, unclear of what
a father did or was supposed to do. We had, in a word, no example.
The only men we ever called “Father” were priests, and among them was
one exalted, the priest of priests, called “the Holy Father”.
All other fathers left … but, surely, the Holy Father
would never leave.
then, in February 2013, the unimaginable happened: Pope Benedict
XVI became the first pontiff to “resign” his sacred office in 600 years.
This Father left … too …
While still reeling from the significance of what Benedict
had done, the next blow to the children came quickly on 4 July (Independence
Day! … from who? The children?) 2015 when our present Pope Francis stunningly
told Catholics that,
“There are no life-time
leaders in the Church” and what is more,
should be a time limit to positions in the Church, which in reality
are positions of service.”
in speaking with the Mexican television station Televisa in March
2014 Francis ominously suggests, that what Pope "Emeritus" Benedict
“should not be
considered an exception, but an institution”.
This would clearly be a rupture in the historical continuity of the
Church, and open the papacy itself to the sort of machinations that,
according to disgraced Cardinal Danneels of Belgian, the leader of the
notorious St. Gallen “Mafia-Club” — which sought to undermine (the too-illiberal)
Pope Benedict's election and subsequently force him from the seat of
Peter in order to elect “their man" (Bergoglio, now Pope
Francis) — resulted in the nomination of the same Bergoglio to further
their own disgraceful agenda in the Church.
Francis repaid the favor — by respectively inviting the two
top members of the St. Gallen Club, Walter Kasper — a vociferous dissident
— as number one, and Danneels — retired — as
number two, to the Synod on the Family! Remember that
Danneels openly boasted of accomplishing his end
by subterfuge via what had been referred to as "Team Bergolglio”
in the St. Gallen Group.
This is openly at odds
with what Francis proclaims:
“Let's be clear. The only
one who cannot be substituted in the Church is the Holy Spirit.”
is true — despite the types of conspiracies that presume to put in place
those whom the Holy Ghost Himself ultimately chooses, to ends known
only to God. However, the Third Person of the Holy Trinity has certainly
been given short shrift in light of the backroom dealings of disaffected
cardinals who presume to steer the Church themselves, apart
from any divine influence. It is, after all, apparently a matter
of “service” ... to a flagrantly dissident agenda contrary to established
Church teaching and the Gospel itself.
“Service” ... not Holy Example
that a father’s sole, or even preeminent
role: to be “of service” to his children … and
that, only for a period of time … of his own choosing?
Are there “term limits” for fatherhood? Is that even a conceivable notion?
Not to me, a father of four. I had already learned the consequences
of “term-limits” to fatherhood first-hand … and they were not pretty.
This is understanding fatherhood as a “policy” and not a “person”.
I am not a policy to my children. Politicians have policies. Bureaucracies
have policies. Corporations have policies. And policies change. But
does this, then, apply to all fathers? Does it apply to priests?
To Religious? Of course their vows (in the case of Religious)
and promises (in the case of diocesan priests), are binding.
Priesthood confers an eternal character on the soul of the priest. This
cannot be eradicated, no matter what the priest does. And the Pope is
a priest and will always remain one, even if he chooses to “resign”
as the Vicar of Jesus Christ on Earth. But even the simplest priest
is called “Father”.
are supposed to be “of service” to their constituents. Police, firefighters,
the military (servicemen)… even the numerous Fraternal Organizations,
the Rotary, the Elks, etc. are supposed to be “of service” to the nation
or the community. Is that the level of the spiritual leadership and
episcopal dignity to which the Church is reduced: simply that of “service”
to the people. Do not even prostitutes provide a “service”?
cuts most is that it applies to two presently living popes
whom many children, and even adults see —or for the past 2000 years
had seen — as surrogate fathers: we find Pope Francis’s recent
openness to stepping down as a father and imposing term limits on it,
and most sadly, Pope Benedict’s having done so. Pope Benedict in a stunning
and incomprehensible move, simply resigned his fatherhood — and now,
following suit, his successor holds this sword of Damocles over the
head of the same children whose spiritual father had just left them.
Remarkably, for Francis it is, apparently, a commendable precedent:
“I may stay or I, too, may go.”
does this tell children in their littleness who depend on the father
for guidance … and most importantly for example?
the children are not important in this relationship.
“I am.” And in a
perverse twist of Jesus words (“exemplum
enim dedi vobis” — “I have given you an example.” St. John
13.15) it implies to the children, “As I have done, you may, too.” When
the going gets tough or the vocation inconvenient, just leave …
is not worthy of a father
a father of children simply resign his fatherhood or become a “father-emeritus”
— the equivalent of an absentee father — and leave his children to the
care of another?
his shortcomings, Pope John Paul II stayed ... refused
to walk out the door … even while excruciatingly debilitated.
Who can forget the photographs of John Paul II in his final weeks and
days? Yet he did not jump ship. He did not leave the children because
he was overwhelmed, or ill, or because the pressure was too great ...
or because it would have been convenient. Why? Because no father
the children — for whatever reason — is
never right. Let me repeat that: Never.
A father does not abandon his children … no matter what … he does not
(as so many fatherless children in America have come to realize) simply
“resign” his responsibility as father. He cannot! He must not!
He is their father! He cannot at will relegate or simply pass
on that responsibility to another. They were given to him!
Not to some other to come.
many must come to the sad conclusion that their Father in Heaven is
the only Father Who will never leave them — for every other father-figure
has proven false …
* The answer is “e” — “all of the above”
… just in the event of any … “confusion”.
Printable PDF Version
Boston Catholic Journal
Totally Faithful to the Sacred
Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome
opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum
Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
know your works ... that you have but little power, and
yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.”
Copyright © 2004 - 2022 Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission
is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying
and distribution of the articles and audio files under the
following conditions: No additions, deletions, or
changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any
way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the
reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text,
or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic