Sacred as Profane — and
the Profanation of the Sacred
The Church is
no longer CONTRARY to the world ...
It is not even DISTINCT from
Can YOU distinguish between the Church
and the Municipal Social Services?
present-day “Catholic” Church
has become — most especially under Francis — a tiresome
reiteration of social correctitude and utterly insipid
platitudes from sources other than Holy
Scripture and Sacred Tradition. Let us be unequivocally
forthright: the Catholic Church, since Vatican II, has become
a de facto Secular and Social Agency,
rather than a Sacred Body instituted by Christ
to faithfully transmit the authentic Catholic Faith and
... oh yes, to save souls.
“God of Surprises”
of Discernment and Accompaniment in Sin”
is the venue pre-eminent where people
noun — not a verb) — while
the rest of us
to one another or
you must understand, is to pretend that one is learned in
a subject of which one knows little or nothing, but nevertheless
wishes to be accounted among the intelligentsia — who, presumably,
use such absurd terms (e.g.
you like to dialogue about what you did today?”)
while the rest of unenlightened mankind witlessly settles
with each other”.
The notion of
the social sciences, feminism and the homosexual lobby —
which are invariably
gender fluidity and a looming environmental catastrophe
etched in oddly indiscernible “carbon footprints”.
How can the quaint notion of the salvation of
souls possibly compete with this present patriarchal
oppression and impending disaster?
Under Francis the Church is
principally concerned with
with other religious traditions it esteems
than Catholicism, and it seeks to acquire — even to
incorporate — their aboriginal wisdom, especially as
it flows from the Amazon basin — wisdom of which the
Church stands in urgent need since the wisdom of Christ
is apparently deficient and stands in dire need of rehabilitation
through more primitive sources.
The real evangel of
Francis’s “Church of Surprise” is to promote a
social and material agenda unmistakably deriving from
the leftist, elitist, liberal,
academic, “intellectual” and wealthy
strata of a purely secular society from which
God is banished as an impediment to the fulfillment of every
inflection of perversion and sin.
The “post-Conciliar Church”
is merely the façade of a spurious ecclesiastical organ
acting within a much broader social and political context.
It has become a temporal functionary — contrived
through Vatican II — to reiterate prevailing secular
social agenda — but in the subtle terms of a sacralized
redaction of what is ultimately a profane Social Manifesto.
Lenin wrote “The State
and Revolution” in an attempt to legitimize what was
essentially a Socialist coup. Perhaps Francis will
— in virtue of his uniquely acquired “personal magisterium”
— write a similar document aptly entitled “The Church
and Revolution” and to a similar end, devastating the
Church much as Lenin had devastated Russia. Lenin argued
the following: “While the State exists there can
be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be
Francis need only substitute a noun: “While the Church exists
there can be no freedom; when there is freedom
there will be no Church.” While Marx spoke of the
away of the state”
as the triumph of Communism, Francis understands it as the
“withering away of
— and the triumph of Modernism! Total indifference and total
Comrade Francis strives precisely to this end.
¿No es así ... camarada?
Ask the suffering Church Militant in China whom he betrayed
— 同志， 這不是這樣嗎
Vatican II was an absolute
culminated in ecclesiastical suicide and the
final triumph of the Second Protestant Revolt (which
was never a “Reformation”) in 1962 that finally abolished
Catholicism, pronouncing its ancient dogma and doctrines
— especially those that accord with, or derive from, the
Sacred Deposit of Faith and Sacred Tradition
— utterly extraneous — the mere vestiges of a presumed medieval
superstition which was once and for all expunged by the
That this was achieved through the complicity of
the “Council Fathers” themselves — most of whom ceased being
“Catholic” long before the “Council” — is the most superficial
intimation of what was to follow.
The Church is no longer contrary to the world.
It is not even distinct from it, but exists as a pseudo-moral
facet of what might be described as a purely synthetic
Quadraplex consisting of a social facet, a
political facet, an economic facet — together
with this spurious moral facet — which simply
endorses — by reflecting — the secular agenda
of other three, contributing of itself nothing
distinct and uniquely substantive — which
is to say that it has become merely a redundant and ultimately
tiresome iteration of Humanism.
This is not the Holy Catholic Church — which remains
unblemished by the corruption of the post-Vatican II
the mere simulacrum of what that fraudulent council, in
its conceit, believed it has abolished — but which remains,
much to its dismay, vibrant and growing — most especially
— and most telling — among the young. (1 Saint John
Key to images above:
Saint Bernadette Church
in Banlay, France
Social Services for
Workers in the Port of Naples Italy
Saint Mary of the
Angels, Los Angeles
Centro Municipal de
Servicios Sociales de Móstoles, Madrid
Church Saint Peter
in Firminy, France
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable PDF Version