“God of Surprises”
of Discernment and Accompaniment in Sin”
is the venue pre-eminent where people
noun — not a verb) — while
the rest of us
to one another or
you must understand, is to pretend that one is learned in
a subject of which one knows little or nothing, but nevertheless
wishes to be accounted among the intelligentsia — who, presumably,
use such absurd terms (e.g.
you like to dialogue about what you did today?”)
while the rest of unenlightened mankind witlessly settles
with each other”.
The notion of
the social sciences, feminism and the homosexual lobby —
which are invariably
gender fluidity and a looming environmental catastrophe
etched in oddly indiscernible “carbon footprints”.
How can the quaint notion of the salvation of
souls possibly compete with this present patriarchal
oppression and impending disaster?
Under Francis the Church is
principally concerned with
with other religious traditions it esteems
than Catholicism, and it seeks to acquire — even to
incorporate — their aboriginal wisdom, especially as
it flows from the Amazon basin — wisdom of which the
Church stands in urgent need since the wisdom of Christ
is apparently deficient and stands in dire need of rehabilitation
through more primitive sources.
The real evangel of
Francis’s “Church of Surprise” is to promote a
social and material agenda unmistakably deriving from
the leftist, elitist, liberal,
academic, “intellectual” and wealthy
strata of a purely secular society from which
God is banished as an impediment to the fulfillment of every
inflection of perversion and sin.
The “post-Conciliar Church”
is merely the façade of a spurious ecclesiastical organ
acting within a much broader social and political context.
It has become a temporal functionary — contrived
through Vatican II — to reiterate prevailing secular
social agenda — but in the subtle terms of a sacralized
redaction of what is ultimately a profane Social Manifesto.
Lenin wrote “The State
and Revolution” in an attempt to legitimize what was
essentially a Socialist coup. Perhaps Francis will
— in virtue of his uniquely acquired “personal magisterium”
— write a similar document aptly entitled “The Church
and Revolution” and to a similar end, devastating the
Church much as Lenin had devastated Russia. Lenin argued
the following: “While the State exists there can
be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be
Key to images above:
Comments? Write us: firstname.lastname@example.org