Suggested Reading:


CCD: Crisis in Catholic Doctrine

Crisis in
Catholic Doctrine:

the Grave State
of Religious Education in America

Boston Catholic Journal

Write us:

 Boston Catholic Journal



Boston Catholic Journal



What are We to Make of Miracles?


 IXOYE - Iesous Xristos Theou Yios Sotare which means Jesus, Christ, Son of, God, Savior.

Rehabilitating the Notion of the Miraculous



The phenomenon of miracles ... what are to make of them?

If — as the Scottish Skeptic and Philosopher David Hume maintainedthe reason for the uniformity of the events we observe is not discoverable; that is, if we can perceive nothing in the way of necessity linking putative causes to supposed effects — and if, therefore, the succession of observed events can always be otherwise than what we observe without implying contradiction — then while we have not answered why miracles occur, we have nevertheless arrived at an explanation of how miracles are able to occur, how miracles are possible.

Miracles, by this reasoning — which I think is correct — are not understood to occur in violation of laws inherent in nature — for there are in effect no laws to be violated; only observed uniform events. From this perspective, what we call miracles are no more than a reordering of an anticipated sequence of events that were never necessary to begin with. And this is simply another way of saying that in effecting a miracle, God merely suspends — but does not violate — what we construe to be laws at work in the universe.

Uniform events, in other words, or uniform sequences of events, for which we have found, experienced, no disqualifying instance, suggest something of necessity.

It is precisely at this point that we make a subreptive leap from statements concerning observations, to illicitly interpreting these observations in terms of laws analogous to the types of laws to which we appeal in, say, geometric models — at least in the way of perceived necessity.

This, however, is a psychological, and not a logical, much less a mathematical, phenomenon — for what we designate as “laws, when examined carefully, we can neither discover through reason nor prove through experience.  Such laws are, and without exception, always formulated retrospectively, in view of past empirical observations. The concatenation of events that science articulates as putative laws are, one and all, assembled a posteriori (after the observation) and therefore possess nothing characteristic of the nature of a priori necessity. Simply that such and such observations have (... up to this point) exhibited unbroken historical pedigree does not rationally qualify them as necessary. Such laws are nothing more than historical statements and are inherently, intrinsically, susceptible to one disqualifying instance sufficient in itself to abrogate the law. We observe an unbroken and historically precise sequence of events which we interpret as linear "causes" that culminate in what we construe as an effect. What we perceive are apparently uniform events. What we do not, and cannot perceive, are the presumed causal connections between successive events in which we have as yet experienced a disqualifying instance, one exception that deviates from the anticipated event and produces another event altogether. The supposed cause, however uniform, remains a mystery to us. That such and such has, up to now, always been the case is altogether different from such and such must be the case. It could be otherwise —without invoking any logical contradiction whatever. It is simply the case that it has always simply been the case —and no more. This is the genius, the perspicacity, really, of David Hume.

What has all this to do with miracles? This is really a penultimate question, for what we really want to know is this:

Is it absurd to give credence to miracles — and at least implicitly, through miracles, to God?

Let us attempt to answer it this way:

If the suspension of “laws” is presumed to be attributable to God in the occurrence of miracles — and such unanticipated or miraculous events are (insofar as reason can discover) at least as likely to occur as the effect we have come to anticipate — then on on what grounds would we be persuaded from ascribing the uniform events that very clearly occur, to God as well, and simply because God wills them?

Such a proposition implies no more contradiction than the problematic inherent in the notion of causality itself. Since causes are not discoverable to reason we have no warrant to ascribe necessity to any event.

It is, I suggest, at least as cogent to argue that God is the cause of this unqualified but unexplained uniformity — as to argue that there is no cause at all. The skeptic will argue, You cannot produce God. We will argue, You cannot produce causes. In our experience, will" is at least intelligible in any concept of agency. Nothing is not.

If this indeed is so, it would be of great consternation to David Hume — who did not believe in God — and there is something terribly condign that a correct line of reasoning, formulated to discredit the existence of God through a disabused notion of causality, should all the more corroborate it.

Geoffrey K. Mondello
Boston Catholic Journal


PDF Printable Version   Printable PDF Version

Comments? Write us:



Boston Catholic Journal

Totally Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome

Scio opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum 
I know your works ... that you have but little power, and yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name. (Apocalypse 3.8)


Copyright © 2004 - 2021 Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying and distribution of the articles and audio files under the following conditions:  No additions, deletions, or changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text, or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic Journal.



The Face

The Face and the Culmination of Vatican II

and the
of Vatican II

Search the Boston Catholic Journal


Free Catholic Audio Library

Listen to — or Download

Catholic Prayers in Latin and English:
and more

The Beauty and Sanctity

The beauty and Sanctity of Traditional Catholicism

 of Traditional Catholicism

Dr. Taylor Marshall

Dr. Taylor Marshall, Catholic

Uncompromising Catholicism

Mother Miriam Live

A Traditional Catholic Nun answers your questions without compromising our holy Faith


The Metaphysics of
Christian Mysticism

The Metaphysics of Mysticism - St. John of the Cross: Reason, Revelation, and the inexorable Logic of the Ascent of the Soul to God by Geoffrey K. Mondello

St. John
of the Cross

Reason, Revelation,
and Logic:
 the Ascent of the Soul to God

Geoffrey K. Mondello

available at Amazon

The End
of Christendom

Archbishop Fulton Sheen - The Fourth Great Crisis in the Church - The End of Christendom

The Fourth Great Crisis
of the Church”

 Why the  Church
— and the West —
are withering

Archbishop Fulton Sheen

The Little Office

The Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary
of the
Blessed Virgin Mary

Saint Michael the Archangel

Prayer to Saint Michael
against satan

Novena to
St Jude

 Novena to St Jude Printable 4-fold with one piece of paper
Printable Booklet
on 1 sheet
of paper, 4-fold, free

The Hammer
and the

Church Militant - Outspokenly  Catholic

Forging the Truth
of Cath

With Mary in the Rose Garden
Mary Immaculate, Mother of God
Reflections on the Rosary
with a Poor Clare Nun and
Padre Pio

Baltimore Catechism - the most authoritative Catechism ever printed

Discover what
the Church

really teaches

Download the PDF

The Practice
of the
Presence of God

 Brother Lawrence

Complete Audio Files

Pope Saint Pius X
Pray for us

“I shall spare myself neither
care nor labor nor vigils for
the salvation of souls”